Substantive Dimensions of the Deliberations

Forum rules

We encourage contributors to the Discussion Board to publicly identify by registering and logging in prior to posting. However, if you prefer, you may post anonymously (i.e. without having your post be attributed to you) by posting without logging in. Anonymous posts will display only after a delay to allow for administrator review. Contributors agree to the QTD Terms of Use.

Instructions
To participate, you may either post a contribution to an existing discussion by selecting the thread for that topic (and then click on "Post Reply") or start a new thread by clicking on "New Topic" below.

The transition to Stage 2 of the deliberations is currently underway but will take some time to complete. In the meantime, we very much welcome additional contributions to the existing threads in this forum.

For instructions on how to follow a discussion thread by email, click here.

Samantha Majic
John Jay College-CUNY
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:00 pm

Data access-- giving back to the community

PostFri May 06, 2016 9:31 am

I have conducted qualitative research with community-based organizations-- namely, nonprofits developed and run by sex workers in the US. To do this research, I did not simply go into the community, take what I needed, and leave; instead, I developed relationships. This meant that in exchange for the interviews I conducted, documents I collected, and participant-observations I engaged in, I gave something back to the community-- I wrote grants, helped clean up after clinic nights, and served food at events, among other activities.

Many other political science researchers engage in similarly reciprocal projects, where the community studied generally expects that the data they provide will only be used by the researcher with whom they have a relationship. If DA-RT requires us to make our data available to other researchers who have no connections to the communities we studied , how does it ensure that these other researchers will also a) earn the community's trust and b) give something to the community in return?

Post Reply


Kathy Cramer
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri May 06, 2016 2:10 pm

Re: Data access-- giving back to the community

PostFri May 06, 2016 2:25 pm

Prof. Majic makes a great point here. I think it is important that we consider our work not as something that we do to the public but instead as something that we do as fellow residents or citizens. I say this because I believe an original and important role of higher education is to improve the human condition, and also because I fear that downplaying that purpose comes at a significant cost to public support for our institutions. It would be a significant mistake if the push for more transparency made us more scientific at the expense of being more disconnected from the people we study.

Post Reply


Tali Mendelberg
Princeton University
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 10, 2016 12:34 pm

Re: Data access-- giving back to the community

PostTue May 10, 2016 2:21 pm

These are good points. Qualitative research requires interpersonal trust and researchers build that personally. That trust may be violated even if all the primary source information is anonymized, because the participants can still recognize themselves and their acquaintances in it. A good piece on that was published recently in the New York Times Couch section on the ethics of publishing reports on clients.

Post Reply


Mneesha Gellman
Emerson College
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 8:20 pm

Re: Data access-- giving back to the community

PostFri May 13, 2016 2:19 pm

Thanks to Majic, Cramer, and others in this thread for raising these important concerns. The human relationships at the heart of much ethnographic work are woven through with ethical implications about why we are given access to particular communities in the first place. The concerns Majic raises - that as ethnographers we are given access to information BECAUSE we show up in person, so how do we know others given access would do the same - points to a major flaw in the notion of data sharing for ethnographic work. Since community engagement cannot be ensured beyond the original researcher's commitment, we are essentially asking communities that invite us in and trust us to provide the same to people who don't "show up". When I think of how it would feel to explain this to the community members who have granted their informed consent to speak with me personally, it is hard for me to imagine their enthusiasm for such an endeavor. It furthers the notion that research is for someone else (the circle of researchers), rather than as something that can also serve the community.

Post Reply



Return to “Substantive Dimensions of the Deliberations”