Substantive Dimensions of the Deliberations

Forum rules

We encourage contributors to the Discussion Board to publicly identify by registering and logging in prior to posting. However, if you prefer, you may post anonymously (i.e. without having your post be attributed to you) by posting without logging in. Anonymous posts will display only after a delay to allow for administrator review. Contributors agree to the QTD Terms of Use.

Instructions
To participate, you may either post a contribution to an existing discussion by selecting the thread for that topic (and then click on "Post Reply") or start a new thread by clicking on "New Topic" below.

The transition to Stage 2 of the deliberations is currently underway but will take some time to complete. In the meantime, we very much welcome additional contributions to the existing threads in this forum.

For instructions on how to follow a discussion thread by email, click here.

Guest

Foreign Policy and Security Research

PostTue Apr 26, 2016 2:25 pm

To amplify some points in an earlier thread, I have concerns about the implications of DA-RT for scholars who study the foreign and security policies of other countries, especially in non-democratic ones where access to information about these topics can be difficult to obtain. This kind of research often involves conducting interviews on the basis of strict confidentiality not to identify the individual in any way, quote them, etc. Such interviews can be incredibly informative and often crucial to the success of a project where secondary sources are lacking and print-based primary sources unavailable or inaccessible to a foreign researcher. Such interviews can almost never be recorded and in some cases, note-taking during the interview may not be possible, which means a full and complete transcript is hard to produce. But the broader point is that any the creation and public distribution of a transcript of the interview would violate the terms on which it was conducted (to protect confidentiality) and could potentially be used to discern the identity of the individual. If such transcripts were required, it would either limit the willingness of scholars to conduct in this kind of research or prevent such research from being published journals that imposed such a requirement. The former would be a much greater concern for graduate students and junior scholars, while the latter would be perhaps more likely for senior or established scholars. Either way, the real cost is the willing to conduct and disseminate research on such topics, which seems to be a high price to pay.

Post Reply


Return to “Substantive Dimensions of the Deliberations”