Substantive Dimensions of the Deliberations

Forum rules

We encourage contributors to the Discussion Board to publicly identify by registering and logging in prior to posting. However, if you prefer, you may post anonymously (i.e. without having your post be attributed to you) by posting without logging in. Anonymous posts will display only after a delay to allow for administrator review. Contributors agree to the QTD Terms of Use.

Instructions
To participate, you may either post a contribution to an existing discussion by selecting the thread for that topic (and then click on "Post Reply") or start a new thread by clicking on "New Topic" below.

The transition to Stage 2 of the deliberations is currently underway but will take some time to complete. In the meantime, we very much welcome additional contributions to the existing threads in this forum.

For instructions on how to follow a discussion thread by email, click here.

Regina Bateson
MIT
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 11:16 am

Resource: Oral History Principles & Best Practices

PostThu Apr 07, 2016 12:41 pm

For those of us who do interviews, DART suggests that we may need to do our interviews with the intention of posting them online or archiving them. To me, this type of interviewing has many similarities with oral history.

Yet oral history is a separate discipline, with its own ethical standards and practices -- some of which are in conflict with current practices in political science. So as we consider moving closer to this model of interviewing, it may be useful for us to consult with oral historians, or even to attend their Annual Meeting. As a first step, here is a link to the Oral History Association's Principles and Best Practices: http://www.oralhistory.org/about/princi ... practices/ .

Post Reply


Return to “Substantive Dimensions of the Deliberations”