Comments on Draft Report of Working Group III.4

Forum rules

To download the working group's draft report, select the "DRAFT REPORT" announcement. Please provide comments or other feedback on the draft via the first topic-thread "Comments on Draft Report ..." You may also continue to view and add to the earlier threads. Please log in first to have your post be attributable to you. Anonymous posts will display only after a delay to allow for administrator review. Contributors agree to the QTD Terms of Use.

You are NOT logged in.

To have your post appear linked to your username, please log in first. If you have just registered, please wait to receive an activation email from qtdfora.

Post a reply


In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you confirm you’re human using Google’s reCAPTCHA service.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Comments on Draft Report of Working Group III.4

Re: Comments on Draft Report of Working Group III.4

Post by Damien Bol » Wed Sep 13, 2017 12:54 pm

Neat report: clear, concise and helpful.

I just have minor comment, but I acknowledge that it's a bit sneaky (sorry for that!). You're advocating for research transparency in this report, but you're not very transparent about how this report was constructed. You say that you're building on the "rich and constructive discussion on transparency in QCA that took place in, especially, Stage 2 of the Qualitative Transparency Deliberations (QTD)" (p.2), but you don't really explain how you did it. For the sake of consistency , It might be worth giving a bit details on the nature of the discussion (how many users, how many comments...), and how you used the content of this discussion to construct your report (which comments did you keep, which one did you drop...).

But again, very helpful report. Thanks.

Damien Bol.

Comments on Draft Report of Working Group III.4

Post by TimButhe » Tue Aug 29, 2017 2:29 am

Please use this thread to share feedback on the draft report

Top